Modern machine builders are under increasing pressure to balance a shortage of skilled labour with surging demand for innovative automation and manufacturing processes. To navigate this quickly evolving, tricky terrain, more and more are choosing PC-based control systems over traditional PLCs to give them the tools and capabilities to work smarter, faster, and in a more cost-efficient way.
In this blog post, we’ll look at three areas where machine builders are benefiting from PC-based control systems and how you too can leverage the technology to help grow your business.
Traditional machine architectures often involve separate CPUs for PLC, motion control, and HMI, which can increase complexities and expenses.
Machine builders are increasingly opting for centralized control, enabled by PC-based systems, to streamline operations and reduce overall machine costs.
Let’s take a closer look at the benefits of centralized control and PC-based systems:
To match the rapid pace of innovation, builders are increasingly asked to integrate diverse functionalities and adapt to emerging technologies. Traditional PLCs often struggle in this area due to their more limited processing power, which restricts them to single tasks.
PC-based control systems, on the other hand, excel in integrating additional functionalities, such as vision systems, robot controllers, or third-party software functions alongside PLC tasks. This flexibility enhances capabilities and eliminates the need for separate control systems.
Labplas, a Canadian manufacturer of sterile sampling bags and accessories, is an example of the transformative impact of PC-based control solutions. By embracing Beckhoff’s open, PC-based control solutions, Labplas revamped its custom production machines and seamlessly integrated robotics. The shift led to an average productivity gain of 25% on upgraded lines, while also enhancing quality control.
While the flexibility provided by PC-based control systems can have an immediate impact, they also equip machine builders with the adaptability needed to navigate future trends and industry developments, including:
When a PLC faces obsolescence, the entire control architecture, including its software, becomes obsolete with it. Companies relying on PLCs, therefore, should expect to completely redesign their control system every five years or so.
In contrast, a PC-based control system promotes a more sustainable approach to system design and maintenance, including:
Unlike PLCs that are tied to specific hardware platforms, PC-based control systems like Beckhoff's TwinCAT 3 utilize a software-centric approach, which offers several key benefits, including:
A project by Sodecia Global Tech and Automation Center exemplifies the power of a software-centric approach. The company successfully redesigned an assembly machine within a tight development timeframe using TwinCAT automation software, in the process achieving a 5.1-seconds-per-part throughput rate.
Software on an IPC easily transfers to new processors, ensuring prolonged system life cycles and reducing the need for frequent and costly redesigns. PLC programs and fieldbus configurations also transition smoothly to TwinCAT runtime on new IPCs, eliminating the need for code modifications. By decoupling software from hardware, this forward-thinking approach ensures code compatibility across different processor generations.
This becomes even more critical in aging control systems and environments, where tight schedules, a reactive approach to maintenance, and obsolete components can turn minor issues into major disruptions. Addressing this requires proactive lifecycle management to document and track hardware and software.
Beckhoff’s proactive Product Life Cycle Management approach can help with this, keeping you informed about product statuses, replacement devices, spare parts, repair services, and guidance on alternative solutions.